Actually I agree with the initial article's author's premise that any other civ would most probabalisticly be much older and much more advanced, but your rejoinder nails the problem. How can we possibly surmise what such a putative super advanced civ would do or could do sufficiently to form a new paradigm detection strategy? Remember, we're not talking about intercepting 'signals' intended for neophyte cive but detecting byproducts of their technological existance. Even so, I agree it's worth making some educated hypothethes, floating them around for discussion via published papers and seeing what concrete scientific approaches result.
Me, I cannot forecast with any confidence the technology that WE might have in 2050 and its implications never mind that of an alien civ 1 billion years more advanced.
Space/Science » in reply to We need to start building some high sensitivity art detectors right away! But seriously...
re: We need to start building some high sensitivity art detectors right away! But seriously...
The whole thread (24 posts)
- Has SETI Been Barking Up The Wrong Tree (Mostly)?
- Look under the lampost
- They're looking for radio signals.
- re: Has SETI Been Barking Up The Wrong Tree (Mostly)?
- You got detailed SETI plans? Then let's hear them. I would be genuinely interested in the details
- faith based, not science based
- Further papers on the subject
- You got detailed SETI plans? Then let's hear them. I would be genuinely interested in the details
- Unwarranted criticism
