Obvoiusly, any of this wierd discussion is clearly impossible and would require...
...massive changes to world history to begin to make sense.
It was a stupid and disturbing analogy to start with. Further, it made the assertion that current Times mgmt. would have been in favor of the Holocaust. You inched towards making that assertion (in the form of a question about ways and means of defense) of me. What's up with you guys?
