re: Talking points

Current Events » in reply to re: Talking points

re: Talking points

Donald — 10/11/2006 4:38:48 AM (archived)

TOM: "Did or did not North Korea and Iran have a full-blown weapons development program prior to 2001?"

MY REPLY: No they did not. And if they did, what has George Bush done about it? He's been in office six years.

TOM: "Would our ground forces be just as tied down in Afghanistan if we had the number of troops there you think we should have?"

MY REPLY: We'd be better off we had put more troops to finish the job in Afghanistan and never went to war in Iraq.

The whole thread (32 posts)

Consensus: "Axis of Evil" protecting themselves from US aggression. - Bowser - 10/10/2006 1:59:23 PM
- Do you really think owning a few nukes could protect the "Axis of Evil" ? - Scott Evil - 10/10/2006 2:46:28 PM
  - Be sure to wear your jackboots when you kick 'em in the head (n/t) - Robert - 10/10/2006 4:23:04 PM
    - Always! - Scott Evil - 10/10/2006 5:40:21 PM
- Connecting the dots - Donald - 10/10/2006 2:04:52 PM
  - Yeah, them's the talking points, all right. - Tom Brosz - 10/10/2006 2:33:31 PM
    - Bush has to be pathetic if Clinton is STILL responsible for everything. - Bowser - 10/10/2006 8:26:28 PM
    - Bush has been in office since 2001. When do you expect him to start on this? - Tony - 10/10/2006 7:34:55 PM
    - The talking point I remember... - alcaray - 10/10/2006 6:06:31 PM
      - re: The talking point I remember... - Tom Brosz - 10/10/2006 7:43:37 PM
        
        And the test, 6 years after implementation of the macho plan, means what about the macho plan? (n/t) - alcaray - 10/10/2006 9:03:40 PM
        
        It means that talking doesn't work on tyrants. - Tom Brosz - 10/10/2006 9:07:27 PM
        
        I've been there and thinking of that for years. - alcaray - 10/10/2006 9:37:05 PM
        
        Pay attention. - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2006 3:10:23 AM
        
        the real difference was: - Tony - 10/11/2006 3:09:00 PM
        
        Well, under Clinton's arrangement... - alcaray - 10/11/2006 5:31:51 AM
    - Talking points - Donald - 10/10/2006 3:00:19 PM
      - re: Talking points - Tom Brosz - 10/10/2006 5:13:44 PM
        
        re: Talking points - Donald - 10/11/2006 4:38:48 AM
        
        A correction. - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2006 5:29:18 AM
        
        re: A correction. - Donald - 10/11/2006 12:44:46 PM
        
        re: A correction. - Tom Brosz - 10/11/2006 5:52:22 PM
        
        One guy was suckered into invading Iraq, the other wasn't. - Tony - 10/12/2006 2:14:46 PM
        
        We should have just stuck to aerial bombardment? - Tom Brosz - 10/12/2006 10:46:45 PM
        
        The allergy must have been contagious - tony - 10/13/2006 2:31:45 AM
        
        Very good post, Tony. (n/t) - YETDAI-YET1 - 10/13/2006 8:54:41 PM
    - the left is full of yippers. (n/t) - Scott Evil - 10/10/2006 2:47:43 PM
      - Wow Scott. Notable debating technique there. (n/t) - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 3:34:30 PM
        
        Why thank you! - Scott Evil - 10/10/2006 4:03:32 PM
        
        re: Why thank you! - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 6:47:43 PM
        
        He got you. - Bowser - 10/10/2006 8:12:36 PM
        
        Can't resist a straight line. - azstrummer - 10/10/2006 9:00:51 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (32 posts)