It may have sank in your memory black hole, but I seem to recall significant opposition from the republicans at all steps military in Clinton era.
Remember Bosnia? Dole was so averse to getting the US involved his solution was "arm the bosnian muslims!"
But I digress, or rather you keep on doing so.
I'll ask again.
Why was it bad for Clinton to attempt peace in Northern Ireland, Balkans, Middle East, to attempt to deal with Arafat and North Korea? Apparently this makes him a moron.
But its good for Bush to have invaded Iraq because he had good intentions, no matter how f'd up it got? "At least he did something."
It's also good for Bush to have done diddly with Iran, Israel/Palestine and North Korea. Each of those were merely photo-ops for Bill, remember?
Am I getting through yet? Can you see honestly see no inconsistency in your position?
Current Events » in reply to We should have just stuck to aerial bombardment?
The allergy must have been contagious
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Consensus: "Axis of Evil" protecting themselves from US aggression.
- Do you really think owning a few nukes could protect the "Axis of Evil" ?
- Connecting the dots
- Yeah, them's the talking points, all right.