re: Photographic evidence is worthless.

Off Topic » in reply to re: Photographic evidence is worthless.

REB — 2/7/2007 9:52:11 PM (archived)

How about the picture that was supposed to be an Iraqi kid that was injured by US solders (Linked here a couple of years ago). I quickly pointed out that the kid looked Vietnamese. On further investigation, it was an old photo from the Vietnamese war.

The whole thread (13 posts)

This might be useful in photo analysis of the typical anomalist fashions-of-the-day - Yeti - 2/7/2007 6:53:15 PM
- More Photoshop fun - TB - 2/12/2007 7:58:02 AM
- This is an ancient art: Photogrammetry. - ER - 2/7/2007 7:08:25 PM
- Here is a picture to test it on. - REB - 2/7/2007 7:08:00 PM
  - Use the tail-hook, Luke, use the tail-hook. (n/t) - ER - 2/7/2007 7:11:03 PM
    - Check out the shadows. - REB - 2/7/2007 7:15:56 PM
      - Photographic evidence is worthless. - ER - 2/7/2007 7:25:28 PM
        
        re: Photographic evidence is worthless. - SteveS - 2/8/2007 5:24:09 AM
        
        re: Photographic evidence is worthless. - TB - 2/7/2007 9:22:15 PM
        
        I was talking about altering an image so it looked like something else. - ER - 2/7/2007 10:05:02 PM
        
        I know. - TB - 2/7/2007 10:09:13 PM
        
        re: Photographic evidence is worthless. - REB - 2/7/2007 9:52:11 PM
        
        An example of the "locate the original" technique.... - TB - 2/7/2007 10:04:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (13 posts)