An example of the "locate the original" technique....

Off Topic » in reply to re: Photographic evidence is worthless.

TB — 2/7/2007 10:04:42 PM (archived)

The key clue here is that the guy who did that excellent photoshop (I tracked it back as far as here, and am assuming for now that this guy actually did the work) didn't bother to change the name of the carrier. Of course, he wasn't trying to perpetrate any kind of hoax, just having fun.

http://ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/2003/02/images_deck_landings/g12906.jpg

The whole thread (13 posts)

This might be useful in photo analysis of the typical anomalist fashions-of-the-day - Yeti - 2/7/2007 6:53:15 PM
- More Photoshop fun - TB - 2/12/2007 7:58:02 AM
- This is an ancient art: Photogrammetry. - ER - 2/7/2007 7:08:25 PM
- Here is a picture to test it on. - REB - 2/7/2007 7:08:00 PM
  - Use the tail-hook, Luke, use the tail-hook. (n/t) - ER - 2/7/2007 7:11:03 PM
    - Check out the shadows. - REB - 2/7/2007 7:15:56 PM
      - Photographic evidence is worthless. - ER - 2/7/2007 7:25:28 PM
        
        re: Photographic evidence is worthless. - SteveS - 2/8/2007 5:24:09 AM
        
        re: Photographic evidence is worthless. - TB - 2/7/2007 9:22:15 PM
        
        I was talking about altering an image so it looked like something else. - ER - 2/7/2007 10:05:02 PM
        
        I know. - TB - 2/7/2007 10:09:13 PM
        
        re: Photographic evidence is worthless. - REB - 2/7/2007 9:52:11 PM
        
        An example of the "locate the original" technique.... - TB - 2/7/2007 10:04:42 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (13 posts)