For instance, the concept of *trinity* in Einstein's formula indicates that mass and energy are somehow interlinked. Mass and energy need space to exist, that in turn indicates that all three *ingredients* are part of all existence, in other words, mass, energy and space can not be totally separated from each other; you, I, and everything in the universe is composed of these 3 *ingredients.*
The scientists already accept the existence of space, mass, and energy, but how can it be proven that those are the fundamental ingredients that make up the universe?
By the way, the *trinity* in theology has been explained in many different ways and it seems to me that many of the explanations are similar to the *trinity* in Einstein's formula.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity
Off Topic » in reply to No one has to prove you are wrong.
What constitutes proof?
The whole thread (25 posts)
- Comment to hank and DanS, from Space board. (originally from Mysteries of the Multiverse)
- Dissecting a photon; for Dan S and frank.
- Good questions
- Questions about your answers.
- By the numbers
- Differences in thought patterns.
- Beware of visualizing how the universe ought to be.
- Differences in thought patterns.
- By the numbers
- Questions about your answers.
- Good questions
- We have all been here before...
- If the medium is taken away . . . ?
- Dissecting a photon; for Dan S and frank.