1) Are you saying that the three inseparable *parts* of an atomic structure can not be referred to as trinity?
2) Or are you saying that there is no relationship between scientific views and the views of the Christian faith?
In answer to number one: The explanation is similar to that of the number 3 being only a single symbol but represents the quantity of three parts.
In answer to number two: In the link that I provided in the previous post, there is the following statement;
“it is the Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy Spirit who proceeds.”
It is clear that the words are designed for the time period that they were written in, but they still contain the basic concept of the three in one.
The concepts are as follows: Father = the one that initiates the next generation; in science, this is equivelent to the force that can cause motion of mass, (*potential* for energy.)(See previous posts)
Son = that fundamental ingredient that can generate into new forms: In science this is equivalent to mass, matter, or Higg's bosons or what ever scientists can come up with to explain the existence of the basic ingredient that makes up the atomic structures and therefore the materials that we are familiar with.
Holy Spirit = that which moves: In science, everything has energy, and therefore, is in motion of some type or another.
If science has found truth in the universe and the scriptures tell the truth about the universe, then the two fields of study must come to the same conclusions.
Off Topic » in reply to Of all the absurd concepts introduced by Christianity,
Do I misunderstand your comment?
The whole thread (25 posts)
- Comment to hank and DanS, from Space board. (originally from Mysteries of the Multiverse)
- Dissecting a photon; for Dan S and frank.
- Good questions
- Questions about your answers.
- By the numbers
- Differences in thought patterns.
- Beware of visualizing how the universe ought to be.
- Differences in thought patterns.
- By the numbers
- Questions about your answers.
- Good questions
- We have all been here before...
- If the medium is taken away . . . ?
- Dissecting a photon; for Dan S and frank.
