What if there was a high Probablility of both occuring?

Flame » in reply to And the asteroid might miss. As you did the point.

Frank N. Stien — 6/5/2007 2:59:35 AM (archived)

And Scientists were evenly divided over what problem needed to be solved first?

Politicians of course would try to please ALL constituancies, thus underfunding both, while grandstanding at ribbon cutting ceremonies.

In the meantime, the forgotton Islamo-facists would aquire nuclear weapons and the world would completely decend into chaos.

But hey...Somewhere in there Hillary Clinton got elected and got us all free healthcare.

The whole thread (14 posts)

Global warming v. asteroids - Bowser - 6/3/2007 3:13:47 PM
- Either way were all dead. - Frank N. Stien - 6/5/2007 2:55:20 AM
- Reality check - TB - 6/3/2007 7:54:19 PM
  - And the Griffin "episode" is, sadly, entirely typical - McFly - 6/4/2007 1:29:09 AM
  - And the asteroid might miss. As you did the point. - Bowser - 6/3/2007 11:13:58 PM
    - What if there was a high Probablility of both occuring? - Frank N. Stien - 6/5/2007 2:59:35 AM
    - re: the point. - TB - 6/4/2007 12:53:02 AM
      - "The only loss will be to the oil companies" is inane, and even you must realize that. - Buck Galaxy - 6/5/2007 8:22:26 AM
      - And a few more "flat earthers" heard from. - TB - 6/4/2007 12:57:45 AM
        
        A lot more links here - Buck Galaxy - 6/5/2007 8:14:47 AM
        
        Links - TB - 6/5/2007 5:21:46 PM
  - Taking one for the team - FrankC - 6/3/2007 8:14:27 PM
    - Additional reading - TB - 6/3/2007 8:44:33 PM
      - re: Additional reading - gbaikie - 6/4/2007 2:00:12 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (14 posts)