Space/Science — HabitableZone

Space/Science » in reply to What he said...

You haven't answered the original question at all

This doesn't really make sense:

Basically the electrical energy is from the moving conductor's own kinetic energy and manifests as a drag force. No energy is tapped from the ambient magnetic field, instead it comes from the moving conductor - just like a regular generator doesn't tap "magnetic energy" from the field of the permanent magnets the rotor is moving in. Alternatively a conductor coupled to a power source in a magnetic field generates an accelerating force, thus providing a form of propulsion - again just like an electrical motor.


Look, the principle of generating electricity with a tether is just an application of good ol' Faraday's Law - moving a conductor through a magnetic field will generate a potential across the ends of the conductor. A current is induced if the circuit is closed by artificial means or perhaps through the plasma in the ionosphere.

No-one is talking about "tapping energy from magnetic fields" or "coupling conductors to power sources". It's just Faraday's Law on electrical induction from the relative motion between a conductor and a magnetic field.

All I wanted to know, is why this in turn should result in the loss of mechanical (ie. kinetic) energy of orbital motion. Alcaray suggested something along the lines of what I would imagine is back-emf. The back-emf resists the motion in an alternator and I guess he thought a similar thing could somehow apply to an orbital tether.

Whatever the actual explanation, you came no closer to it with your last post.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (22 posts)