Well duh. Of course you do Tom because you're the first to attack. Only you do it in a chickenshit way with some veiled reference to someone's party or ideology or twist their words to use against them when their original post wasn't a personal attack at all.
And then you sit back smugly like this claiming to be the victim. Victims don't cause rage in others Tom. They cause sympathy and many that I've seen attack you back out of desperation are exactly the types that have tremendous empathy for others.
Well now we know that your little exile from controversy and a few little posts critical of a lame duck president were just more of your strategy. You'd suck us in once more believing you had some reason left and then go for the jugular. And, as always you start the crap here in your favorite little board of CE where there's rules of engagement knowing that most others play by those rules. You haven't the balls to really engage people in Flame where folks will immediately rake you over the coals.
Must be real reassuring for you to know you have such loyal allies too like Lee the illiterate racist. What costume do you have planned for your sidekick?
Art
Current Events » in reply to re: Guess who is holding the empty bags of salt
"I get a lot more personal abuse on this board than I dish out."
The whole thread (30 posts)
- The Road Home
- New York Times calls for surrender. Why is this news?
- A prediction, based on history.
- a draft
- re: A prediction, based on history.
- One last point on history
- There was "genocide" and "regional war" in Iraq before 2003
- Picking nits.
- When
- Busting
- PS
- re: Busting
- Busting
- When
- PS: see below Regarding 'Foam'
- Picking nits.
- There was "genocide" and "regional war" in Iraq before 2003
- You are exactly right
- "America is not going to stand for that."
- A prediction, based on history.
- New York Times calls for surrender. Why is this news?
