"The accusation of "flame" implies a personal attack, not a criticism of a group of people"
Ahh yes, but that's why ER has a moratorium for not posting anything political over on Current Events, because he sees an abuse there that is similiar to a "flame", something of a "personal attack" (at least HE feels that way) which however some criticize as "a group of people".
There's always derisiveness here when the subject of anomalous phenomena comes up and of course I take it personally, because I am usually the one discussing it or the one defending it. At least I try putting it into a context that takes it out of the realm of fantasy and ridicule and into one of speculation.
Usually all I get are the third grade retorts.