Most the time I don't bother.
I think I agree with you, and if it is him, we've had communications off the board and talked a little more logically back and forth. Although he IS a professional, he sure lets his hair down over here. My respect for his "professionalism" also goes out the door.
Calling me names under a pseudonym is pure cowardice.
I'm used to being made fun of, (like from my kid brother when he was fifteen), but the crap I take over here tells me way more of where THEY are at, than I care to know.
I'll talk with skeptics for a bit, and as long as they remain in a conversant mode, I'll still chose to play. When the chat becomes abusive, then I take it personally. We all know our limits over here. We've been down this road before.
Flame » in reply to It's still NAV
Yeah, I checked the IP address
The whole thread (43 posts)
- The "believers"
- The "unbelievers"
- Lindy, please.
- The whiners
- there is something to what you say, but......
- "Nothing, nada, zip?"
- Hey, I'd love to do healthcare here. I've done a lot of it on other forums. (n/t)
- Lindy's all tangled up in her Religion
- And you're all tangled up in your self-importance (n/t)
- I knew when you attacked ER and his reasonable, non-hostile comments...
- re: I knew when you attacked ER and his reasonable, non-hostile comments...
- Oh, everyone is just against you and your ideas, aren't they?
- re: I knew when you attacked ER and his reasonable, non-hostile comments...
- I knew when you attacked ER and his reasonable, non-hostile comments...
- And you're all tangled up in your self-importance (n/t)
