We were talking about how the Democrats would react to Bush committing the same act that led to impeachment proceedings for Clinton.
Bowser's point was that the R's attacked Clinton for offenses much milder than what he considers Bush's atrocities. If the R's attacked Clinton for getting his knob polished (and lying under oath to the American public), then they should be far more incensed with what Bush has done with/to Iraq.
I think the reality is that a political party will not attack it's own leadership- as evidence by the Senate vote on the charges against Clinton.
How many minutes could Bush swear testimony before committing perjury
More like a few seconds after placing his hand on the bible...
"What if Clinton had led the US and Middle East into this mess? What if he had lied about WMDs
The Republicans would skewer Clinton...
Flame » in reply to I don't know. Are you?
I don't think so?