This post, in particular.
Just curious: What sort of science do you "do?" Keep in mind that one of the criteria used by global warming advocates to disqualify scientists who have questions is "not a climate scientist."
I spent the 70s listening to idiots tell me the Earth was doomed in twenty years. Yet these scientists are still respected and listened to now. Last time I saw Ehrlich, he was crapping on Bjorn Lomborg.
"The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it."
Bonus points if you can remember where THAT came from.
The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?
The scientists now tell us that despite falling levels of catalysts, we won't see any real changes for about fifty years. You have to admit that's convenient. I have seen probably a dozen different theories in the past few years to account for why we might not see any changes at all despite the Montreal Protocol. Also pretty convenient.
Continued from "Community"
The whole thread (43 posts)
- Continued from "Community"
- Redefine "do" to popular slang nomenclature.
- re: Interesting
- "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?"
- Largely, I have said what I have to say to you