Nope, not a specialist.

et — 3/20/2008 3:37:09 AM (archived)

I have a background in physics, a large constituent of the science involved.
That said, I just listen to and trust those who are climate experts. Experts in the physics and chemistry of atmospheres, as well as data analysis and/or simulation. I'll take them over any hack the Telegraph or WSJ can dredge up, any day.

www.realclimate.org

The whole thread (43 posts)

Continued from "Community" - TB - 3/19/2008 8:24:51 PM
- Redefine "do" to popular slang nomenclature. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/20/2008 8:29:30 AM
- re: Interesting - Johannes - 3/20/2008 3:05:09 AM
  - Since this is flame... - ARRELL - 3/20/2008 3:42:12 AM
    - Who let the dogs out? (n/t) - Woof woof - 3/20/2008 6:37:15 PM
    - re: Imagine that - Johannes - 3/20/2008 6:02:58 PM
    - RL, "Since this is flame...", you are one crude, rude sack of shit. - Bowser - 3/20/2008 3:52:56 PM
      - :) yet You are the one that used obscenity - ARRELL - 3/20/2008 6:53:18 PM
- "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?" - et - 3/20/2008 2:48:55 AM
  - re: "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?" - gbaikie - 3/21/2008 6:43:48 AM
    - Oooh, oooh, oooh. I got just the thing. Ahem. - et - 3/21/2008 9:54:09 PM
      - Well - Lee - 3/21/2008 11:11:39 PM
        
        What does that even mean? CO2 molecules wear out after 100 years? (n/t) - alcaray - 3/22/2008 1:07:54 AM
        
        No. - Lee - 3/22/2008 4:16:39 AM
        
        Clearly, CO2 levels are rising. I don't think your statistic means what you think it means. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/23/2008 1:05:50 AM
        
        I'm not concerned by it. - Lee - 3/23/2008 2:35:30 AM
        
        I love it when you guys get called on some bluster or other. And you just move on as if you never said what you said. - alcaray - 3/23/2008 3:54:02 AM
        
        I see what you were referring to now. - Lee - 3/23/2008 6:57:23 AM
        
        re: No. - gbaikie - 3/22/2008 11:53:45 AM
  - re: "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?" - Johannes - 3/20/2008 3:15:05 AM
    - Uh, lower. - et - 3/20/2008 3:37:58 AM
- Largely, I have said what I have to say to you - Yeti - 3/19/2008 9:40:14 PM
  - You work in R&D? - TAFKASE - 3/20/2008 5:24:21 PM
    - Sure, Scotty - Yeti - 3/22/2008 3:15:45 PM
    - Lab Rats - Steve - 3/21/2008 3:50:49 AM
    - I think he's academic research staff - TB - 3/20/2008 8:46:44 PM
  - Are you a climate scientist? - TB - 3/20/2008 1:26:06 AM
    - re: Are you a climate scientist? - et - 3/20/2008 2:58:38 AM
      - How about you? - TB - 3/20/2008 3:17:01 AM
        
        Nope, not a specialist. - et - 3/20/2008 3:37:09 AM
        
        re: Nope, not a specialist. - TB - 3/20/2008 3:17:06 PM
        
        Check your premises. ;-) (n/t) - S' d'Anconia1 - 3/22/2008 10:09:38 AM
        
        Ad infinitum - et - 3/21/2008 9:51:39 PM
  - An ideology based upon inconvenience. - Bowser - 3/20/2008 12:01:03 AM
    - re: An ideology based upon inconvenience. - gbaikie - 3/22/2008 11:08:36 PM
  - Why not... a PS - Yeti - 3/19/2008 9:48:38 PM
    - re: Why not... a PS - gbaikie - 3/22/2008 9:52:27 PM
    - Abandoned hypotheses - TB - 3/20/2008 1:45:24 AM
      - "forget that our original Iraq approach kind of stunk" - Tony - 3/20/2008 1:51:13 PM
        
        Run the logic diagram in the other direction. (n/t) - TB - 3/20/2008 3:12:17 PM
        
        the other direction. - Tony - 3/21/2008 1:47:10 AM
        
        Now you're the guy who always, always pointed to Bush's ratings - - - - Bowser - 3/20/2008 3:49:09 PM
        
        Since when? - TB - 3/20/2008 4:26:17 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (43 posts)