No. – Flame – HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to What does that even mean? CO2 molecules wear out after 100 years?

No.

Lee — 3/22/2008 4:16:39 AM (archived)

According to the "Consensus", most Human produced CO2 would be absorbed by the oceans and plant life within 100 years. Evidently that didn't sound too bad for many folks, so now they're saying it would linger for thousands of years. The horror story keeps getting worse and worse with each telling.

The whole thread (43 posts)

Continued from "Community" - TB - 3/19/2008 8:24:51 PM
- Redefine "do" to popular slang nomenclature. - SDAI-Tech1 - 3/20/2008 8:29:30 AM
- re: Interesting - Johannes - 3/20/2008 3:05:09 AM
  - Since this is flame... - ARRELL - 3/20/2008 3:42:12 AM
    - Who let the dogs out? (n/t) - Woof woof - 3/20/2008 6:37:15 PM
    - re: Imagine that - Johannes - 3/20/2008 6:02:58 PM
    - RL, "Since this is flame...", you are one crude, rude sack of shit. - Bowser - 3/20/2008 3:52:56 PM
      - :) yet You are the one that used obscenity - ARRELL - 3/20/2008 6:53:18 PM
- "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?" - et - 3/20/2008 2:48:55 AM
  - re: "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?" - gbaikie - 3/21/2008 6:43:48 AM
    - Oooh, oooh, oooh. I got just the thing. Ahem. - et - 3/21/2008 9:54:09 PM
      - Well - Lee - 3/21/2008 11:11:39 PM
        
        What does that even mean? CO2 molecules wear out after 100 years? (n/t) - alcaray - 3/22/2008 1:07:54 AM
        
        No. - Lee - 3/22/2008 4:16:39 AM
        
        Clearly, CO2 levels are rising. I don't think your statistic means what you think it means. (n/t) - alcaray - 3/23/2008 1:05:50 AM
        
        I'm not concerned by it. - Lee - 3/23/2008 2:35:30 AM
        
        I love it when you guys get called on some bluster or other. And you just move on as if you never said what you said. - alcaray - 3/23/2008 3:54:02 AM
        
        I see what you were referring to now. - Lee - 3/23/2008 6:57:23 AM
        
        re: No. - gbaikie - 3/22/2008 11:53:45 AM
  - re: "The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?" - Johannes - 3/20/2008 3:15:05 AM
    - Uh, lower. - et - 3/20/2008 3:37:58 AM
- Largely, I have said what I have to say to you - Yeti - 3/19/2008 9:40:14 PM
  - You work in R&D? - TAFKASE - 3/20/2008 5:24:21 PM
    - Sure, Scotty - Yeti - 3/22/2008 3:15:45 PM
    - Lab Rats - Steve - 3/21/2008 3:50:49 AM
    - I think he's academic research staff - TB - 3/20/2008 8:46:44 PM
  - Are you a climate scientist? - TB - 3/20/2008 1:26:06 AM
    - re: Are you a climate scientist? - et - 3/20/2008 2:58:38 AM
      - How about you? - TB - 3/20/2008 3:17:01 AM
        
        Nope, not a specialist. - et - 3/20/2008 3:37:09 AM
        
        re: Nope, not a specialist. - TB - 3/20/2008 3:17:06 PM
        
        Check your premises. ;-) (n/t) - S' d'Anconia1 - 3/22/2008 10:09:38 AM
        
        Ad infinitum - et - 3/21/2008 9:51:39 PM
  - An ideology based upon inconvenience. - Bowser - 3/20/2008 12:01:03 AM
    - re: An ideology based upon inconvenience. - gbaikie - 3/22/2008 11:08:36 PM
  - Why not... a PS - Yeti - 3/19/2008 9:48:38 PM
    - re: Why not... a PS - gbaikie - 3/22/2008 9:52:27 PM
    - Abandoned hypotheses - TB - 3/20/2008 1:45:24 AM
      - "forget that our original Iraq approach kind of stunk" - Tony - 3/20/2008 1:51:13 PM
        
        Run the logic diagram in the other direction. (n/t) - TB - 3/20/2008 3:12:17 PM
        
        the other direction. - Tony - 3/21/2008 1:47:10 AM
        
        Now you're the guy who always, always pointed to Bush's ratings - - - - Bowser - 3/20/2008 3:49:09 PM
        
        Since when? - TB - 3/20/2008 4:26:17 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (43 posts)