re: Interesting
You guys seem to reflect some of my sentiments, even though you do not accept my premises.
TB said:
The Montreal Protocol is 20 years old. How's that ozone hole been coming along?
The scientists now tell us that despite falling levels of catalysts, we won't see any real changes for about fifty years. You have to admit that's convenient. I have seen probably a dozen different theories in the past few years to account for why we might not see any changes at all despite the Montreal Protocol. Also pretty convenient.
Could I suggest that the ozone depletion is NOT caused by chemicals.
Yeti said:
Its clear that you don't come here to discuss issues to arrive at a new understanding, or a consensus, or as a way of pushing society, however minutely, in the right direction via discourse. You come here to pontificate about how wrong everyone else is. What just floors me, is that after you have been wrong again and again and again- demonstrated not by rhetoric, but by the course of history, you still continue in your absolute belief that you and your politics are absolutely correct, and everyone else are incorrect, dishonest and motivated by some anti-human or anti-us agenda.
The above seems to apply to both of you.
