Hillary would have to win big in those states to get any real advantage from them. I think, in the case of a revote, the results would be a statistical tie giving Hillary no edge.

I'm afraid Hillary's experience is nothing more than a talking point and, in my mind, experience equals one thing in Washington - cementing ties with special interests.

Let's talk about how her experience worked for her:

1. She used political judgment that she needed to appear tough instead of common sense to authorize the Iraq War and voted for McCain-Lieberman authorizing Bush to take action against Iran.

2. She's voted for a flag burning amendment to the Constitution.

3. She's embedded herself with "The Family", a powerful religious/political organization composed of fundamentalist neo-con Washington insiders. Do some research into the membership of that group.

4. She's flat out lied about the foreign policy achievements she was involved in during her husband's administration such as brokering peace in Bosnia and Northern Ireland.

I could go on and on about the illusion of her "experience". Last month's Time magazine had an excellent article in it about how Washington political experience has in no way been an assurance of presidential success over our short history. In fact some of our greatest leaders were the ones with smallest political resumes. Imagine that.

If Rev. Wright gives you the heebie-jeebies, you're more than entitled to your feelings but take a look into the leaders of the "Family" that Hillary belongs to and the numerous fundamentalist Christian wackos that McCain is in bed with. If Wright is going to hurt Obama, it can easily be turned around to nail his opponents with the same slime. This one's a draw if you just do a little research.

Art