Listen to yourself here:

"Hillary would have to win big in those states to get any real advantage from them. I think, in the case of a revote, the results would be a statistical tie giving Hillary no edge."

So Hillary won strongly the first time but because YOU THINK it would come out a statistical tie let's forget a revote? What kind of lame argument is that!? Hillary would be ahead by one delegate NOW if they were counted. She would likely be way ahead by the end of the process. We have five months until the convention. OBVIOUSLY there needs to be a revote in both states and the only reason there isn't is because powerful Obama supporters are blocking it. Let the people decide. There's still plenty of time to hold redo primaries.

This entire process puts a spotlight on the undemocratic nature of the Democratic party. The 800 superdelegates is an idiotic and elitist idea. It's got to go. Party insiders trying to pressure candidates to quit early in the process should be banned. Caucuses where winners and losers somehow get the same amount of delegates need to go as well. The convoluted system in some states makes election appear almost rigged! Were this a primary only election Hillary would have wrapped it up.