The mass of Earth's atmosphere: 5.1 x 10^18 kg
Or 5.1 x 10^15 tonnes
Or 5,100,000,000,000,000 tonnes
What affect would there be if last year Earth lost 1 billion tonnes of atmosphere?
None. Our temperature wouldn't change, and the pressure wouldn't change, and the ocean wouldn't evaporate any faster. Nor would make any noticeable different if we lost a billion tonnes per year for last 10 years, though if this happened for a thousand years:
1,000,000,000,000 tonnes as compared to:
5,100,000,000,000,000 tonnes than you might have something noticeable. A small effect.
Or you could 10 billion tonnes lost per year for 100 year and also get 1.0 x 10^12 tonnes.
Or 20 billion tonnes per year for 50 year. One could get a small effect- probably not easily measured, but *maybe* it might be measurable, maybe one could get as much as .1 C change.
Now if earth lost 1/1000th of this amount: 1 million tonnes per year [1.0 x 10^6 tonnes] for a billion years [1.0 x 10^9] one would lose a about 1/5th the Earth's atmosphere during this time. And in 2-3 billion years lose about 1/2 of Earth atmosphere.
It's probably safe to say that Earth on averages loses 1 million tonnes or less per year- at least in regard to net losses.
So, therefore if Earth is currently losing say 20 billion tonnes per year, that would be at least a 20,000 times increase in rate in compares to Earth's possible average rate. And at that rates loses 1/2 the Earth's atmosphere in 1/20,000th of 2-3 billion years [around 100,000 years].
So with that is mind how much atmosphere do you imagine Earth is losing? And I think the bigger problem than temperature changes would losing the entire atmosphere within a relatively short time.
Flame » in reply to re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
The whole thread (65 posts)
- "Global temperatures 'to decrease'"
- Smoothly worded...
- re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
- re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
- re: You asked
- re: You asked
- He shouldn't have. (n/t)
- re:.Why the comment?
- Still waitng for the data that should significant atmospheric pressure drop in the nuclear age... (n/t)
- re: Yeah me too
- See graph in post below that shows pressure for past 200 years...
- re: Yeah me too
- You need evidence you can produce.
- re: Goes to show you that history is important, even in science. (n/t)
- hearsay is not history (n/t)
- As is a good memory (n/t)
- re: I remember 32 inches of mercury, just can not verify it. (n/t)
- Who gives a rat's ass what you 'remember'?! - "THE LUND INSTRUMENTAL RECORD OF AIR PRESSURE1780–1997"
- I remember 7 inches.
- Anything that can not be verified
- re: I remember 32 inches of mercury, just can not verify it. (n/t)
- re: Goes to show you that history is important, even in science. (n/t)
- "shows", not "should" (n/t)
- re: Yeah me too
- Still waitng for the data that should significant atmospheric pressure drop in the nuclear age... (n/t)
- re:.Why the comment?
- re: You asked
- re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
- re: Smoothly worded...
- re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat
- Smoothly worded...
