Who gives a rat's ass what you 'remember'?! - "THE LUND INSTRUMENTAL RECORD OF AIR PRESSURE1780â€“1997" – Flame

Flame » in reply to re: I remember 32 inches of mercury, just can not verify it.

Who gives a rat's ass what you 'remember'?! - "THE LUND INSTRUMENTAL RECORD OF AIR PRESSURE1780â€“1997"

ARRELL — 4/11/2008 5:30:50 PM (archived)

The Lund instrumental record of air pressure 1780â€“1997:

http://www.nateko.lu.se/Elibrary/LeRPG/2/Image16.gif

http://www.nateko.lu.se/Elibrary/LeRPG/2/LeRPG2Article.htm

1atm=101325 Pa= 1013.25 hPa=29.921261 inches of mercury

It took 5 minutes to find this using google...

Barometric pressure readings are often standardized by expressing them in units of inHg32 - The 32 refers NOT to the inches of mercury measured, but to the normalization to a temperature of 32 degrees F. You were simply confused about what you read in a century old book decades ago either before or after you developed your obviously pathological delusional beliefs.

Now will you shut the hell up, or take your garbage elsewhere, or will you continue to make a fool of yourself as you have for years?

The whole thread (65 posts)

"Global temperatures 'to decrease'" - Bowser - 4/7/2008 7:22:48 PM
- Smoothly worded... - TB - 4/7/2008 9:06:22 PM
  - re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat - Johannes - 4/8/2008 3:05:24 AM
    - re: The Mystery of Global Warming's Missing Heat - gbaikie - 4/8/2008 6:58:14 AM
      - re: You asked - Johannes - 4/9/2008 1:03:48 AM
        
        re: You asked - gbaikie - 4/9/2008 3:57:09 AM
        
        re: You asked - Dave - 5/7/2008 8:34:36 AM
        
        re: You asked - Johannes - 4/9/2008 6:14:43 PM
        
        re: You asked - gbaikie - 4/9/2008 8:05:29 PM
        
        re: You asked - gbaikie - 4/10/2008 2:57:33 AM
        
        He shouldn't have. (n/t) - TB - 4/9/2008 1:10:20 AM
        
        re:.Why the comment? - Johannes - 4/9/2008 5:52:00 PM
        
        Still waitng for the data that should significant atmospheric pressure drop in the nuclear age... (n/t) - Tony - 4/9/2008 8:10:05 PM
        
        re: Yeah me too - Johannes - 4/10/2008 3:00:45 AM
        
        See graph in post below that shows pressure for past 200 years... - QED - 4/11/2008 8:56:34 PM
        
        re: Yeah me too - gbaikie - 4/10/2008 8:58:41 PM
        
        re: Interesting - Johannes - 4/11/2008 3:09:31 AM
        
        On the topic of measuring human induced radiation. - ER - 5/7/2008 1:11:34 PM
        
        re: Interesting - gbaikie - 4/11/2008 7:13:13 AM
        
        ...Like a fish an a banacle debating how to ride a bicycle... The funny thing is Johannes' willfull stupidity is just like yours and TB's on global warming... - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 7:25:39 PM
        
        re: ...Like a fish - gbaikie - 4/11/2008 9:49:18 PM
        
        However, most here accept that you are a complete idiot... - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 9:54:05 PM
        
        re: However, most here accept that you are a complete idiot... - gbaikie - 4/12/2008 12:35:37 AM
        
        You need evidence you can produce. - alcaray - 4/10/2008 7:45:59 AM
        
        re: Goes to show you that history is important, even in science. (n/t) - Johannes - 4/10/2008 7:43:39 PM
        
        hearsay is not history (n/t) - alcaray - 4/10/2008 10:42:25 PM
        
        re: I consider old books as part of human history. (n/t) - Johannes - 4/11/2008 2:40:08 AM
        
        However your delusional memory of old books is just part of your human insanity... There are centuries of data showing you wrong - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 7:39:41 PM
        
        hearsay - alcaray - 4/11/2008 2:46:26 AM
        
        As is a good memory (n/t) - Tony - 4/10/2008 7:52:13 PM
        
        re: I remember 32 inches of mercury, just can not verify it. (n/t) - Johannes - 4/10/2008 8:19:08 PM
        
        Who gives a rat's ass what you 'remember'?! - "THE LUND INSTRUMENTAL RECORD OF AIR PRESSURE1780â€“1997" - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 5:30:50 PM
        
        Thats it Johannes- ignore the data, maybe we will forget about it... - ARRELL - 4/12/2008 5:13:58 AM
        
        re: I would answer your request but - Johannes - 4/12/2008 4:19:27 PM
        
        The data you asked for is there, and it proves you to be completely wrong - ARRELL - 4/12/2008 6:11:07 PM
        
        Is that where the 32 came from? - alcaray - 4/11/2008 6:34:37 PM
        
        Yes, but I'm rather partial to 42. - Yeti - 4/11/2008 8:28:24 PM
        
        NOW TAKING BETS: Will Johannes admit that he was completely and irrefutably wrong? - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 6:53:50 PM
        
        Can't you two just Hg and get along? (n/t) - Yeti - 4/11/2008 8:34:31 PM
        
        There are also millions of data points from the 18th and 19th centuries... - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 6:05:31 PM
        
        32 inches of mercury would be WAY off the scale of that graph - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 5:56:40 PM
        
        I remember 7 inches. - alcaray - 4/10/2008 10:44:01 PM
        
        Why Pascal's wife was so frustrated... - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 6:26:12 PM
        
        See, I heard it was because she couldn't take the pressure... (n/t) - Yeti - 4/11/2008 8:31:46 PM
        
        Its more impressive if you do it metric-style... 177.8 mm (n/t) - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 5:42:25 PM
        
        alcaray!!!! (n/t) - Jody - 4/11/2008 6:09:30 AM
        
        I remember one bar (n/t) - podrock - 4/11/2008 2:11:13 AM
        
        You missed... - alcaray - 4/11/2008 2:41:57 AM
        
        Or did you, now that I think about it? (n/t) - alcaray - 4/11/2008 2:42:37 AM
        
        Depends on the size of the Barr.... - Yeti - 4/11/2008 3:08:16 AM
        
        I killed a bar by a tree one time... (n/t) - Daniel Boone - 4/11/2008 4:35:21 AM
        
        Was it the one that kil-o-pascal? (n/t) - Yeti - 4/11/2008 8:33:07 PM
        
        Because I was rather partial to ol' pascale... - Yeti - 4/11/2008 8:39:16 PM
        
        okay...this has GOT to be Tom...it is about a bar...as I look at the IP...yep! I was right. (n/t) - Jody - 4/11/2008 6:12:08 AM
        
        Anything that can not be verified - Yeti - 4/10/2008 10:40:41 PM
        
        Besides... - TB - 4/11/2008 1:16:50 AM
        
        re: The question is - Johannes - 4/11/2008 2:32:59 AM
        
        ALL that needs to be said on your garbage: http://www.habitablezone.com/currentevents/messages/488429.html - ARRELL - 4/11/2008 6:13:16 PM
        
        re: please do not quote RL's numbers - Yeti - 4/11/2008 3:05:21 AM
        
        re: You asked: - Johannes - 4/12/2008 1:06:21 AM
        
        "Third, numbers can be used to indicate that bumble bees can not fly yet they do so in nature. " - only if you use the numbers incompetently, as you are prone to do... - ARRELL - 4/12/2008 1:55:44 AM
        
        "shows", not "should" (n/t) - Tony - 4/9/2008 8:10:46 PM
        
        Noooooooo - Yeti - 4/9/2008 8:16:55 PM
        
        re:Mastered the dark side, I doubt that yeti has. Hmmmmmm. (n/t) - Johannes - 4/10/2008 8:06:30 PM
  - re: Smoothly worded... - gbaikie - 4/7/2008 10:27:48 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (65 posts)