re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....?

Flame » in reply to "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....?

re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....?

gbaikie — 4/29/2008 7:04:58 PM (archived)

Very ironic.

You miss the point in your eagerness to be stupid.

No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."

Any scientist or doctor which is experimenting on humans without their consent is acting immoral and giving such scientist or doctor something that amount small dollar fine or slap on the wrist would also be amoral.

For instance a doctor taking the kidneys of prisoners is immoral- and those doctors [which are apparently doing it] in China because the State sanctions it, should be punished. And in that particular case I could be quite happy if such doctors were executed.
And in general killing such monsters would make me happy- rather than in any way being upset and sad because what they did is "understandable" and they were "forced" to do it.

The whole thread (39 posts)

Should science be guided by morality? (n/t) - Jody - 4/27/2008 11:06:17 PM
- I am a stem cell research advocate - Jody - 4/29/2008 1:57:18 AM
  - So, really is Bush. - Bowser - 4/29/2008 5:23:24 PM
    - ...and I will be more than happy to research your stem...awoka woka (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 8:04:37 PM
      - Just stay out of his genes (n/t) - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 6:32:31 PM
        
        No DNA swapping! (n/t) - Tony - 5/1/2008 7:29:54 PM
      - What're you celling? (n/t) - Bowser - 4/29/2008 8:18:13 PM
        
        proper stimulation (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 9:36:29 PM
        
        Don't you mean stem-ulation? (n/t) - ER - 4/30/2008 12:25:59 PM
        
        Damn! I wish I had thought of that! (n/t) - Jody - 4/30/2008 3:29:51 PM
        
        You didn't? What WERE you thinking? :-) (n/t) - Bowser - 4/30/2008 7:47:53 PM
- Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea. - Lee - 4/28/2008 5:48:28 PM
  - re: Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea. - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 2:05:27 AM
    - "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. " - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 8:08:53 PM
      - re: "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. " - gbaikie - 4/30/2008 11:51:59 PM
    - "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....? - ARRELL - 4/29/2008 1:18:48 PM
      - Eugenics occurs everyday in this country. - Lee - 4/29/2008 8:31:27 PM
      - re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....? - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 7:04:58 PM
        
        "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."" - ARRELL - 4/30/2008 9:17:01 PM
        
        re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor..."" - gbaikie - 5/1/2008 1:34:59 AM
        
        Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - ARRELL - 5/1/2008 1:55:27 AM
        
        re: Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - gbaikie - 5/1/2008 3:39:15 AM
        
        re: Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post... - ARRELL - 5/2/2008 7:49:08 AM
        
        Post by Herb removed. - moderite podrock - 5/2/2008 7:50:26 PM
      - Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum - ER - 4/29/2008 2:48:44 PM
        
        re: Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 7:28:08 PM
        
        I think "All the above posts [ER and ARRELL] are perfect examples of..." - alcaray - 4/29/2008 8:03:05 PM
        
        *giggle* (n/t) - Jody - 4/29/2008 8:06:14 PM
        
        re: More Irony - Yeti - 4/29/2008 4:30:13 PM
- AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science... - nick hoffman - 4/28/2008 11:51:35 AM
  - Good morality IS science. - SDAI-Tech1 - 4/30/2008 12:01:47 AM
  - Nice! I like that (n/t) - McFly - 4/29/2008 9:09:38 PM
  - re: AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science... - gbaikie - 4/29/2008 1:34:08 AM
    - "Name one" - ARRELL - 4/29/2008 1:23:04 PM
  - Excellent point. And indeed, sometimes it is. - Bowser - 4/28/2008 5:08:26 PM
- Science itself? No. - Mary Anne - 4/28/2008 4:28:13 AM
- Science should not be guided by morality. - ER - 4/27/2008 11:59:45 PM
- Which morality? Whose? Regarding what? - Bowser - 4/27/2008 11:16:50 PM
- And: Should morality be guided by science? - podrock - 4/27/2008 11:14:58 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Flame

The whole thread (39 posts)