Not really surprising, I have learned to expect it from you.
The positions you hold conflict with the moral code you espouse... when pressed to reconcile this conflict your pathetic attempts come across as the rantings of a very confused and twisted mind....
It would be a honor to kill them. Getting the Nobel peace prize would pale in comparison.
....
Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral.
fascinating... it explains a lot about you...
and yes, you might have missed it but no one else did, that is your ass you just got handed.
Flame » in reply to re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor...""
Apparently YOU are the ONLY one that missed the fundamental contradictions in your post...
The whole thread (39 posts)
- Should science be guided by morality? (n/t)
- I am a stem cell research advocate
- Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea.
- re: Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea.
- "Killing a fewer people for the sake of theoretical many is immoral. Limiting the happiness of a fewer people for the sake of a theoretical many, is immoral. "
- "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....?
- Eugenics occurs everyday in this country.
- re: "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor...", anyone missing the irony here....?
- "I would be happy to kill any scientist or doctor" .... "No, I wouldn't be happy "to kill any scientist or doctor...""
- Word substitution exercise--reductio ad adsurdum
- re: Eugenics is science guided by morality, but not many support the idea.
- AU, contraire. Morality should be guided by science...
- Science itself? No.
- Science should not be guided by morality.
- Which morality? Whose? Regarding what?
- And: Should morality be guided by science?
