Lawbooks weren't exactly what I had in mind.
In fact, that is something that could probably be much better communicated online. No one immerses themselves in a law book, reading it from cover to cover, reading criticism and commentary of it, and studying it as a unified narrative, although they may certqainly do that when researching a particular case or precedent. It's more like a manual for a 56 Studebaker automatic transmission, or the Official Rules of Cricket, or The Atlantic Coast Pilot: Thames Estuary to Tierra Del Fuego.
All valuable and useful volumes, indeed, but not a unified conceptual and philosophical statement.