Does make one wonder. Also if the decay rate increases could that trigger a nuclear runaway? Could Mercury's (or Venus's) mantle have been partially blown away when fissiles were more prevalent in the past?
And just how long ago was that past??? Makes you think. Of course if the variation was too high then there would be too much heat from decay and the Earth would've suffered a massive melt-down. But, a few years back, the molecular clock dates for the Last Common Ancestor of terrestrial life was only ~2 Gya, even though the oldest life traces were in rocks dated to ~3.8 Gya. Could Earth really be that much younger???
Definitely a line of research to watch very carefully.
Space/Science » in reply to Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
Would Mercury be older or younger radiometrically?
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
- Previous work on variations in the fine structure constant with Earth-Sun distance
- Would Mercury be older or younger radiometrically?
- [Finnish Babel deleted]
- Anyone else besides me reminded of Vernor Vinge?
- re: Nuclear Decay variation
- Plasma Opacity and Optical Depth
- That theory is subject either to verification or debunking; and one or the other is quite possible thanks to...
- re: Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
