So, some points that may be covered in the paper....
1) Based on the variation in decay rates how large a variation in the Fine Structure Constant is required?
In 2006 Gabrielse et al determined the value of the FSC to be ~137.035999710 with part per billion uncertainty using a measurement of the electron magnetic moment, g. Is the required variation in the FSC large enough to show up in the Gabrielse experiment?
2) The FSC plays a part in determining the measured values in countless experiments... from particle physics, to atomic spectra, to low light interacts with matter... Is there a reason why it wouldn't have been noticed in these other experiments?
3) Wouldn't this variation in the FSC be noticeable in the spectra of our sun and other stars and nebulae?
Space/Science » in reply to Mass and stars
I haven't been able to find the full paper online....
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
- Previous work on variations in the fine structure constant with Earth-Sun distance
- Would Mercury be older or younger radiometrically?
- [Finnish Babel deleted]
- Anyone else besides me reminded of Vernor Vinge?
- re: Nuclear Decay variation
- Plasma Opacity and Optical Depth
- That theory is subject either to verification or debunking; and one or the other is quite possible thanks to...
- re: Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
