My understanding of the 'many universes' hypothesis goes like this: Every possible combination of initial conditions that is capable of long-term duration has occurred (or will occur, or is still occurring... verb tenses get a little strange out here), but their differences prevent them from communicating with each other. That is, nothing which exists in one of those universes can exist in any other. Hence, the often-used 'bubble' analogy.
If it can be determined that the fine-structure constant (which -- again, to my rudimentary understanding -- is a mathematical combination of many basic physical constants) is variable within this Universe without affecting its overall viability, that implies that the same is true for others. In each, local conditions could be identical to those in other universes, and communication -- not merely of information but matter -- is not only possible but, given the weight of numbers and fullness of time, likely.
To put it another way: The domain walls of multiverse 'bubbles' might be more like the membranes of biological cells, with pores where properly-shaped objects from either side can find a way in, or out.
Space/Science » in reply to Hertz-prung-Russel not a sensitive enough probe of stellar interiors. a
re: Speculation on implications
The whole thread (32 posts)
- Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
- Previous work on variations in the fine structure constant with Earth-Sun distance
- Would Mercury be older or younger radiometrically?
- [Finnish Babel deleted]
- Anyone else besides me reminded of Vernor Vinge?
- re: Nuclear Decay variation
- Plasma Opacity and Optical Depth
- That theory is subject either to verification or debunking; and one or the other is quite possible thanks to...
- re: Nuclear Decay Rates May Be A Function Of Earth-Sun Distance
