The problem isn't "intellectual," "educated," "academic," and "smart" people.
The problem is "intellectual," "educated," "academic," and "smart" people who think they are therefore destined to run things for those they consider "trash," or at the very least, keep the "trash" away from the tiller. What's hilarious is that so many of them are nowhere close to as smart as they think they are.
This attitude literally radiates from many liberals like neutrons from an atomic pile, and most of them don't even see it. If Obama loses, this will be a major reason. They won't see it then, either. It will be all about an electorate that just wasn't smart enough or "broad-minded" enough to see the world the way they do.
At least you are perceptive enough to list "intellectual," "educated," "academic," and "smart" as separate categories...
Current Events » in reply to Elitist and proud of it.
re: Elitist
The whole thread (25 posts)
- Perspective on Palin
- I'm bookmarking this for after the election.
- re: Top Clinton fundraiser backing McCain, not Obama