Well?... SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN magazine has done it...again.

Jacob — 10/2/2008 4:29:36 PM (archived)

The October, 2008 issue has an interesting article with coverpage treatment..

Basically it indicates that the "Big Bang theory" is dead;
quantum physics equations show that the universewill never die [really?].

And instead of a "Big Bang" there was a "Big Bounce".

So does that mean that the "Big Bang theory" will have
to be relegated to being an "anomaly"? and treated as such
here at HZ?

The whole thread (9 posts)

Well?... SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN magazine has done it...again. - Jacob - 10/2/2008 4:29:36 PM
- It is just a theory with no confirmation for it at this point. - alcaray - 10/2/2008 7:07:18 PM
  - There's speculation; There's speculation squared; and then there's Cosmology. ;-) (n/t) - Jacob - 10/4/2008 4:43:25 PM
    - Parts of cosmology seem to rely more on theories than on scientific facts (n/t) - Raoul - 10/5/2008 9:10:40 AM
  - Evoluting - Raoul - 10/3/2008 9:28:09 PM
    - ? - SDAI-Tech1 - 10/6/2008 7:33:54 AM
  - The Big Bounce? - Socrates II - 10/3/2008 3:32:26 AM
    - Sort of like landing on Mars. - Bowser - 10/4/2008 3:46:12 AM
    - Offtopic and tasteless posts removed... - moderite podrock - 10/4/2008 2:05:50 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Space/Science

The whole thread (9 posts)