I never said your source was wrong or went into any particulars of the GDP formula. You know as well as I do though that what you linked to was a cover your ass reply from some governmental peon. It could have been true. It could have been false. I'm just pointing out that there is a strong motivation for that agency to paint a rosy picture and that other sources might be more credible or just as credible.
If maybe once, when you posted your little linky, you said "Here's a source that could be a credible counter to what was said but its existence on a website controlled by an administration wanting to paint a rosy picture could call into question its credibility." just maybe you'd establish some as well.
But no, Tom just dumps his links on us as if the words on an HTML page make it true and beyond reproach.
Keep it up. It must feel frustrating to be ignored so often.
Art
Flame » in reply to Was wondering how long that would take.
Same old distortion
The whole thread (30 posts)
- And now, what could Obama do that would make him a great President
- Does Anthrax in the mail count as terrorism? (n/t)
- "one of great things Bush managed to do was prevent another terrorist attack on the US"
- Earth to GBaikie
- Replace our existing power grid with 600 AP1000 reactors. (n/t)
- Listen to every damned neocon coming down the pike? Do what Bush did?