I'm still firmly convinced that the Republicans have or at least had as part of their political strategy voter and election fraud and definitely illegal or unethical disenfranchisement.

My guess is that Franken's win was actually much larger than the few hundred votes. What saved Franken was probably the same thing that saved all the Democratic winners this election cycle. They won big. The fraudulent methods the Republicans have resorted to over the last few election cycles only work when it's really close. Large scale manipulation is easily discovered.

So now tell me Tom. Would you have preferred Coleman winning over Franken despite the fact that it looks like Coleman has a huge stench of corruption hanging over him? (I'm not holding my breath for your answer by the way because you'll just deny Coleman is corrupt, that the accusations are just the workings of the liberal media and you'll dig up some O'Reilly dirt on Franken.)

Interesting though that you're up to you old tactics. Even though I admitted there were things I didn't like about a Democrat, there was nothing conciliatory in your response. You immediately sensed blood and went for the attack mode. I would have expected nothing less. You wonder why people ignore your posts.

Art