re: even easier - but wrong – Geek Speak

re: even easier - but wrong

Nick Hoffman — 2/9/2009 3:40:33 AM (archived)

trouble is, if two bodies are side-by-side and you look into the model where they overlap, they appear contiguous, but Pod is looking for a true 3D overlap...

The whole thread (19 posts)

Question for the CAD Crowd: - podrock - 2/7/2009 10:42:04 PM
- mesh to solid - SDG - 2/14/2009 1:39:41 AM
  - Almost - podrock - 2/14/2009 8:51:24 PM
  - re: interesting - mip - 2/14/2009 4:32:34 PM
    - one way of doing it perhaps - mip - 2/14/2009 4:35:19 PM
- Autodesk was pretty limited with its import/export options - mip - 2/8/2009 6:06:01 PM
  - Thanks, mip - podrock - 2/8/2009 7:22:09 PM
    - shortcut - mip - 2/9/2009 2:28:24 AM
      - even easier - mip - 2/9/2009 2:34:15 AM
        
        re: even easier - but wrong - Nick Hoffman - 2/9/2009 3:40:33 AM
- re: Question for the CAD Crowd: - TB - 2/7/2009 11:15:26 PM
  - To use as a cutting tool for other solids - podrock - 2/8/2009 12:52:31 AM
    - Stair-step effect - nick hoffman - 2/8/2009 12:16:02 PM
      - I knew it, my explanation wasn't clear. - podrock - 2/8/2009 4:59:18 PM
        
        Limited experience with 3-d solids - Nick Hoffman - 2/8/2009 10:09:09 PM
    - re: To use as a cutting tool for other solids - TB - 2/8/2009 2:50:28 AM
      - re: To use as a cutting tool for other solids - podrock - 2/8/2009 4:29:38 PM
        
        re: To use as a cutting tool for other solids - TB - 2/9/2009 1:25:37 AM
        
        Been having fun all day.... - podrock - 2/9/2009 5:42:54 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Geek Speak

The whole thread (19 posts)