Current Events » in reply to no - it isn't. Again - what would YOU do?

The whole thread (24 posts)

• Stealth health care nationalization - TB - 2/11/2009 5:22:31 AM
  • Health care nationalization - SteveS - 2/11/2009 11:56:57 PM
    • re: Health care nationalization - Eric - 2/12/2009 1:22:55 AM
      • re: Health care nationalization - SteveS - 2/12/2009 2:08:27 AM
  • Conservative word-spin. I'm reading about this all over. - Bowser - 2/11/2009 8:41:25 PM
  • It could gravitate that way - FrankC - 2/11/2009 7:24:52 PM
    • re: It could gravitate that way - TB - 2/11/2009 8:05:01 PM
      • I don't disagree - FrankC - 2/11/2009 8:31:13 PM
        • re: I don't disagree - TB - 2/11/2009 8:43:11 PM
  • I thought Obama said he wasn't going to allow underhanded legislation? - Lee - 2/11/2009 1:06:41 PM
  • And what's your plan for getting preventative health care to all citizens? (n/t) - Bowser - 2/11/2009 6:44:07 AM
    • Sure as hell it won't involve putting politicians in charge of it. (n/t) - TB - 2/11/2009 6:45:19 AM
      • He asked what your plan IS, not what your plan ISN'T (n/t) - Doug Ellison - 2/11/2009 8:45:41 AM
        • The answer is, "Nothing". Would be happy with fewer people with medical care. - Bowser - 2/11/2009 9:35:48 PM
        • But that is an effective answer. - TB - 2/11/2009 5:01:17 PM
          • no - it isn't. Again - what would YOU do? (n/t) - Doug Ellison - 2/11/2009 8:19:16 PM
            • I made the point. - TB - 2/11/2009 8:47:45 PM
          • An example - TB - 2/11/2009 5:07:34 PM
            • That cuts both ways. - et - 2/11/2009 5:59:46 PM
              • re: That cuts both ways. - TB - 2/11/2009 6:07:49 PM
                • re: very costly drug probably of limited value - Andrew - 2/11/2009 8:17:21 PM
                  • The point is who gets to decide. - TB - 2/11/2009 8:33:30 PM
                    • re: The point is who gets to decide. - Andrew - 2/11/2009 10:00:47 PM
      • OK. Fine. What WILL it involve, and when? - Bowser - 2/11/2009 7:05:37 AM