The words are one thing.

And when someone supported Bush, Cheney, torture, deficits, huge government, massive deficit spending, optional wars, when someone seamlessly shifted from regime change to nukes to WMDs to democracy to Saddam was worse and then claims to have supported a balanced budget, small government, and so on is beyond belief.

I'm amazed, frankly.

And then to say they have integrity, intellectual honesty is to torture the meaning of those concepts the way the word 'surrender' is tortured.

For one thing, integrity is accepting the consequences of one's actions. Quite a concept, huh?