Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to I agree with your reluctance about making this a Constitutional issue.

I'm reluctant to make *anything* a Constitutional issue.

The original intent of the Constitution was to list what government was allowed to do, and what the citizen was not allowed to do, and it was supposed to be a very short document. That was a long time ago.

In our present climate, where the assumption of infinite government authority is becoming mainstream (all along the political spectrum, unfortunately), a Constitutional convention would be a disaster, and we'd probably end up with an amendment mandating that horses wear pants. If we were lucky, that's all we'd get.

"We need a Constitutional amendment to..." is a phrase that immediately raises a red flag for me, although like almost every other American I can see a couple of tweaks I'd like to make, too.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (11 posts)