Science Manipulated - Syun Akafosu on Climate Change – Off Topic

Science Manipulated - Syun Akafosu on Climate Change

S — 6/5/2009 12:58:39 AM (archived)

6. There is no firm observational confirmation that CO2 is really responsible for the warming during the last century. It is simply and (sic) assumption or hypothesis that the IPCC has presented as a fact.

Climate Change:Science Manipulated

It is not only science that is being manipulated, but the people, as well. The big question is for what purpose?

S

The whole thread (31 posts)

Science Manipulated - Syun Akafosu on Climate Change - S - 6/5/2009 12:58:39 AM
- "for what purpose? " - ER - 6/5/2009 11:48:50 AM
  - Money is Green - S - 6/5/2009 10:03:10 PM
    - I've heard the one-note samba before. You heard it here, didn't you. - ER - 6/5/2009 10:59:36 PM
      - It isn't the money. It's the power. - TB - 6/6/2009 9:59:36 PM
        
        Scientists from all over the world are really con artists and facists - Buck Galaxy - 6/7/2009 6:16:35 AM
        
        It isn't the scientists running this show, Buck. (n/t) - TB - 6/8/2009 12:15:00 AM
        
        Do you deny that Dr. Akasofu is a scientist? (n/t) - S - 6/7/2009 9:35:39 PM
      - That never fails to amaze me. - Bowser - 6/6/2009 4:08:56 AM
        
        The OC Register weighs in on UHI - S - 6/6/2009 7:02:29 PM
        
        It seems to have escaped your attention - S - 6/6/2009 5:55:22 PM
        
        The Grassy Knoll Gunmen came in black helicopters and wore skinny ties. - ER - 6/6/2009 12:47:21 PM
        
        Back to the issue - S - 6/6/2009 6:51:08 PM
        
        You can believe anything you like. - ER - 6/6/2009 7:33:12 PM
        
        Who is this 'We' you keep referring to? - S - 6/6/2009 7:38:09 PM
        
        I also don't care how you carry on. - alcaray - 6/6/2009 11:03:38 PM
        
        That's your choice - S - 6/6/2009 11:12:53 PM
        
        You asked. I answered. (n/t) - alcaray - 6/7/2009 4:08:02 AM
        
        It's good to know who speaks for whom. Thanks. (n/t) - S - 6/7/2009 10:03:49 PM
        
        I think it's well established that ER speaks for ER. - alcaray - 6/7/2009 11:24:13 PM
        
        Was it something I said? (n/t) - ER - 6/7/2009 11:58:34 PM
        
        Yes... - alcaray - 6/8/2009 1:43:11 AM
        
        Shadowy groups don't have spokespersons. - ER - 6/6/2009 7:57:51 PM
        
        Source and substance - S - 6/6/2009 10:12:44 PM
      - Wind Turbines, White Roofs, Carbon Sequestering Schemes - S - 6/5/2009 11:39:13 PM
        
        Oh yeah, hundreds of billions, I'm sure. - ER - 6/5/2009 11:58:58 PM
        
        New Zealand may go bust over Global Warming - S - 6/6/2009 7:52:01 PM
        
        The shift to green jobs = pay cut of nearly 60% - S - 6/6/2009 7:49:37 PM
        
        $9.6 trillion and more than 1 million lost jobs by 2035 - S - 6/6/2009 7:29:50 PM
        
        You're not making any sense, - ER - 6/6/2009 8:39:21 PM
        
        One person's loss is another person's gain - S - 6/6/2009 9:45:22 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (31 posts)