The entire premise is based on a single New York Times story that constructs that premise out of anonymous tips from a classified briefing. We would learn a lot more about motivations if we knew exactly where those tips came from. Again, the irony of this revolving around leaks of a classified briefing seems to escape you, or the convenience of politicians making speculative accusations that opponents would have to openly violate the law to respond to (this isn't the first time, either).
Read the damn story. Look at how hard the NYT story has to work to maintain the idea that there was some sinister Cheney plot. People with actual names have said nothing of the sort happened,
You want a shorter answer? I don't need to answer the question because the question is a load of crap to start with.
Current Events » in reply to You're the one trying to do the duping
Does it bother you at all that you're so easily duped?
The whole thread (22 posts)
- Still no word from DICK?
- A Pyrrhic victory? Or charity for all?
- plotting
- What's actually going on
- We already knew that's what you were going to say.
- Man, you are delusional in a big way.
- Really.
- You miss the point, as always. Who gives a rat's ass about Pelosi being vidicated, besides Pelosi?
- What the "briefings" were like, and why there is confusion.
- Really.
- I remember now hearing about the prisoners