No. They don't.

Current Events » in reply to The largest drug companies spend more on executive bonuses than on research.

No. They don't.

TB — 7/28/2009 4:03:50 PM (archived)

In 2008, Pfizer spent $8 billion, or about 16 percent of overall revenues, on research and development.

In 2007, the combined compensation for the top 500 CEOs of all the companies in the U.S. was $5.7 billion.

Are we done here?

The whole thread (23 posts)

North Korea weapons tests on children - TB - 7/24/2009 9:33:44 PM
- Specifically: handicapped and mentally ill children - SDAI-Tech1 - 7/24/2009 10:26:29 PM
  - Socialism and Communism are similar in the essential policy of State Supremacy. - David F Mayer - 7/27/2009 1:02:06 AM
    - You sound like someone that is taking it personally... - FrankC - 8/1/2009 1:21:56 AM
    - Horseshit. - TB - 7/27/2009 5:12:57 AM
      - Yes, I am free to say what I want. But my input is insignificant. - David F Mayer - 7/28/2009 12:35:57 AM
      - Thats' Because You're Confusing The Impacts of Capitalism With Those of Democracy - Marsby - 7/27/2009 5:18:43 PM
        
        re: Capitalism - TB - 7/27/2009 5:46:37 PM
        
        I disagree. - David F Mayer - 7/28/2009 2:50:00 AM
        
        re: I disagree. - DR - 8/7/2009 6:55:39 PM
        
        re: I disagree. - TB - 7/28/2009 4:05:26 AM
        
        The largest drug companies spend more on executive bonuses than on research. - David F Mayer - 7/28/2009 1:25:58 PM
        
        No. They don't. - TB - 7/28/2009 4:03:50 PM
        
        I did some homework. Here is what Pfizer says officially. - David F Mayer - 7/30/2009 8:59:54 PM
        
        Administration - TB - 7/31/2009 2:27:06 AM
        
        It is interesting... - TB - 7/31/2009 4:08:00 AM
        
        I don't believe it. Please post some sources to back up your statements. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/29/2009 12:36:07 AM
        
        You've got to be kidding. (n/t) - TB - 7/29/2009 1:44:41 AM
        
        Rereading your post, I note the following non-sequitur. - David F Mayer - 7/29/2009 10:31:01 PM
        
        re: non-sequitur - TB - 7/29/2009 10:53:00 PM
        
        You are correct. I must research that company. Back later with the results. (n/t) - David F Mayer - 7/30/2009 12:08:35 AM
        
        There is a big difference. - SDAI-Tech1 - 7/28/2009 3:56:38 AM
        
        Economic freedom is being abused. New regulation is needed. And I don't buy the "tiny fraction" either. - David F Mayer - 7/28/2009 1:20:38 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Current Events

The whole thread (23 posts)