You're right about that. I even found bright orange construction tape knotted in a large circle at the Martinsell formation. Colin Andrews pointed out the construction lines to me, yet the formation is beautiful from the air and even lovely to stand and gaze in. We did a group meditation there after two cameras failed and locked up. (Thankfully mine wasn't one of them). Colin's wife and I experienced exactly the same vision.
>"The other thing I want to try is using a broomstick to create the smaller weave."
By jove, I think you have a decent explanation. Not that I'd try it out here with all the copperheads, but it just might work.
>"Each weave took about 10 seconds. It's really easy, and once you get going, you could create all kinds of crazy patterns."
I heard from a very reliable source that National Geographic paid the hoaxers 2,000 pounds to hoax a circle or two, and there are so many...I wonder which one will show up in their special next year. I'm sure they'd pay the farmer off too or be subject to liability. I stayed far away from the cameras and still am an avid torch bearer to bring the hoaxers out into the limelight. I sit with the farmers and their outrage on this one.
>"What will they think of next? Sprinkling magnetite to throw off your magnetometers? "
There IS some sort of energy that is created by even the hoaxed patterns and one of the doctors I was with gave us a presentation of the new physics behind it including wave entrainment and some of it went right over my head. As I mentioned, we had a total of 3 cameras failing and one extremely bent key in hoaxed circles, so he is right about that....however I digress.
As for the magnetite, one hoaxer claims he bought some magnetite from a science shop and sprinkled it around; however he never expalined how he heated it and melted it to the seedheads. I atually met him at one of the lectures and had the chance to trip him, but decided against it because it might have drawn attention to myself (it was very hard to restrain myself, though...:~;)
Off Topic » in reply to The geometry itself is pretty simple.
Pivot points
