GCN Circular 45972
EP261015a: Tentative fading of the candidate optical counterpart from the NOT
From: Gregory Corcoran at University College Dublin
Issued: 2026-10-17 16:03 UTC
Type: X-ray Transient, Optical Transient
G. Corcoran (UCD), D. B. Malesani (DAWN/NBI and Radboud), A. Martin-Carrillo (UCD), P. G. Jonker (Radboud) A. L. Bouquin (NOT), A. Caballero Almagro (NOT), E. Georgiou (NOT and Turku Univ.) report on behalf of a larger collaboration
We observed the field of the Einstein Probe fast X-ray transient EP261015a (Li et al., GCN 45956) using the ALFOSC camera on the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT). Observations consisted of a sequence of 5 x 300 s exposures in SDSS-r band and started on 2026-10-17 at 02:12:26 UT (1.54 days after event start). Due to the telescope pointing and dither pattern, there are some artifacts caused by a bright star to the north of the target that affect part of our images.
After dropping two images affected by the bright star and performing image subtraction against a Dark Energy Survey stacked image, we clearly detect the candidate discussed by Corcoran et al. (GCN 45955), Mendez et al (GCN 45960), and Ma et al. (GCN 45963). We measure a difference magnitude of r = 23.18 +/- 0.10 (AB) calibrated against nearby stars in the Pan-STARRS catalog and not corrected for Galactic extinction at a midtime of 2026-10-17 02:20:22 UT (1.54 days after event start).
We also refined our photometry on the previous epoch presented in GCN 45955 to r = 22.64 +/- 0.12. This shows fading between epochs with a decay of t^{-0.51+/-0.15}. We note that the uncertainties on our photometry neglect the difficult to estimate systematic uncertainties inherent to image subtraction between instruments, therefore the statistical significance of the fading cannot be reliably determined.
The nature of this object is still not fully clear. An X-ray source has been reported by EP/FXT within the EP/WXT error circle (Li et al., GCN 45969), positionally inconsistent with the above candidate. This source is however the likely counterpart of a spectroscopically confirmed QSO (DESI spectral viewer (legacysurvey.org)), thus likely unrelated to the EP/WXT event (no significant variability is detected in the QSO flux between our two epochs). The optical fading would then favor an association of the candidate with EP261015a, though an unrelated transient (e.g. a SN) cannot be fully discarded.
Further monitoring is planned and encouraged to clarify the nature of this object.
Filter: only the top 10% of the past year's X-ray transients are posted, ranked by the number of GCN Circulars written about them (now ≥ 11). Thresholds are recalculated monthly. Only events first reported within the past 7 days can start a thread.
Relayed automatically from NASA's General Coordinates Network.
Transient Alerts » in reply to EP261015a — X-ray Transient, Optical Transient
On 15 October 2026 the Einstein Probe, a space telescope that watches for X-ray flashes, saw a brief flare lasting about two minutes in the southern sky. Telescopes then found a faint, slowly changing point of visible light in the same area, sitting on top of a faint galaxy. It faded a little in the first day and a half, then brightened again around day 4 and stayed roughly steady through day 5. A separate, fainter X-ray source in the same region was found to belong to an unrelated, known quasar (a distant galaxy with a very bright core). The leading idea is that the visible light is a supernova (an exploding star) linked to the X-ray flash, but this is not confirmed, and no distance has been measured yet.
How unusual is it? A visible-light counterpart was found for an X-ray flash, and its rebrightening hints at an accompanying supernova, which is not typical of most such flashes. It is not exceptional because the link is unconfirmed, the source could be an unrelated transient, and no distance is known; a spectrum confirming a supernova or giving a distance would settle the verdict.
Written by an AI model (claude-sonnet-5-5) from the official reports in this thread, and rewritten as new reports arrived (version 4); last updated . It may contain mistakes: the reports themselves are the authority.
The whole thread (16 posts)
- EP261015a — X-ray Transient, Optical Transient
- Updated explainer: what the latest reports add (AI-written)
- EP261015a: GSP multiband optical follow-up observations
- EP261015a: Further optical observations with the 1.3m DFOT
- EP261015a: AZT-20 Assy-Turgen optical observations
- Explainer: what this is and why it matters (AI-written)
- EP261015a: Wendelstein 43 cm optical observations
- EP261015a: Follow-up with the 1.3-m DFOT
- EP261015a: Terskol Zeiss-2000 optical upper limit
- EP261015a: COLIBRÍ optical observations of a rebrightening
- EP261015a: Tentative fading of the candidate optical counterpart from the NOT
- EP261015a: refined analysis of EP-FXT observations
- EP261015a: J-band upper limit with WINTER
- EP261015a: SVOM/VT optical observation
- EP261015a: COLIBRÍ optical observations
- EP261015a: Einstein Probe detection of a fast X-ray transient
