Quite so!

alcaray — 1/10/2010 7:57:38 AM (archived)

To insist that that means public presence at every discussion is to misconstrue. It would be impractical and impracticable, as well.

The whole thread (20 posts)

Obama's C-Span problem - TB - 1/6/2010 5:31:11 PM
- Re: Obama's C-Span problem - buckgalaxy - 1/8/2010 11:50:17 PM
  - Everybody hides their negotiations. - alcaray - 1/10/2010 2:17:26 AM
    - Good lord, indeed. - Eri - 1/10/2010 5:20:36 AM
      - Quite so! - alcaray - 1/10/2010 7:57:38 AM
      - You assume that they meant that *everything* would be open and transparent? - alcaray - 1/10/2010 6:59:59 AM
        
        Do you recall reconcilliation meetings ever being televised? - alcaray - 1/10/2010 11:07:50 PM
        
        The wool over everyone's eyes. n/t - Eri - 1/10/2010 11:15:51 PM
        
        If it's all an open secret, then what the hell are they scared of? - TB - 1/10/2010 9:23:10 PM
        
        Re: then what the hell are they scared of? - TB - 1/11/2010 12:50:27 AM
        
        other options - BuckGalaxy - 1/11/2010 6:14:53 PM
        
        Re: other options - TB - 1/11/2010 6:53:13 PM
        
        Re: If it's all an open secret, then what the hell are they scared of? - BuckGalaxy - 1/10/2010 11:52:15 PM
        
        THERE ARE NO SECRETS HERE. - BuckGalaxy - 1/10/2010 8:42:55 AM
        
        Not everything, just things like healthcare reform. - robvg - 1/10/2010 7:40:28 AM
      - They aren't making that connection. - TB - 1/10/2010 6:10:28 AM
      - Help me out. - robvg - 1/10/2010 5:25:57 AM
        
        Just different lies. - Eri - 1/10/2010 1:02:49 PM
    - Good Lord. - TB - 1/10/2010 3:15:19 AM
  - Shorter version: - TB - 1/9/2010 12:33:43 AM

Recent posts

The whole thread (20 posts)

Related discussions