It's become pretty obvious that this kind of thing is a lot less about saving endangered species than it is about kicking industry and development in the teeth. That they are as hostile toward clean energy projects as they would be toward any other kind is very revealing.
From the article:
^Of course, the law's the law: if BrightSource showed wanton disregard for endangered wildlife, we ought to thank conservationists for holding the company to account. But that doesn't square with the fact that, in early 2010, BrightSource announced its intent to allocate $25 million to relocate the 25 turtles discovered during its site survey. While it's hard to fathom exactly what sort of desert digs might be had for $1 million per tortoise - pity the poor turtle who toddled out of the survey area just hours before the wildlife biologists took their count - that's apparently not enough. As Western Watershed's lead activist put it: "We want the project to go away."^
Current Events » in reply to U.S. Losing Resource Wars to ... Turtles
Re: Resource Wars
The whole thread (25 posts)
- U.S. Losing Resource Wars to ... Turtles
- Re: U.S. Losing Resource Wars to ... Turtles
- Asteroid mining
- Nothing is ever achieved without a cost
- PS, a recomendation for your reading list
- Metalurgy is complicated
- R&D people!!
- Re: Resource Wars
- Resource Wars
- Simply put.....
- Re: Resource Wars
- Re: U.S. Losing Resource Wars to ... Turtles
- What does that actually mean? (n/t)
- The world is crazy
