First, your dittoheads had to SIGN a pledge to block anything Obama tried. Sign the damned thing. So we blew your non-obstructionist argument out of the water. With no mention of having been wrong yet, but we've discussed those who cannot admit that before.

Second, you are not trying to discuss an issue, you are trying to "win" at all costs. Obama inherited a country on the very verge of collapse due to serious mismanagement over the previous 8 years. Republicans, Democrats, Independents and the Rest Of the World were seriously concerned. It took drastic measures to prevent the entire financial structure from failing. Instead of job creation, the focus was on saving whatever was possible of the jobs we had. There was Republican support for this, because they were the beneficiaries of the bailouts. You know that's true, yet choose to ignore it in order to "win" an argument. Sometime would you try to see reality instead of sound good?

You forget all this, choose to fault Obama for not creating jobs. You think that a Senate with a one Lieberman majority was a Democratic Senate. You know that's not true, again, and he was facing a Republican lockstep, no individual thought, bunch of Senators. YOu know that, too, and choose to ignore it.

When you are ready to argue in a reasonable manner let me know. Right now you don't know how, you think you are. Read some articles on the art of arguing, on resolving issues, how to stick to a topic and how to acknowledge that sometimes one makes mistakes and then get back to me.

Arf