Flame — HabitableZone

Flame » in reply to A classic "idiot savant"?

disfunctional thinking

Hey I pointed out quite early on MSNBC his repeated, obtuse insistence on easily demonstrated factualy wrong points but folks got all upset that I was being too critical. Well, when a idiot posts and re-posts the same wrong info, say on the # of stars within 75 LY that's off by over a factor of 10 and then can't follow a hiigh school volumetric ratil calculation based on his own quoted reference data...it's obvious that the entity known as bluh has some serious thinking disfunction.

Log in or register to post.

The whole thread (5 posts)