Re: Too Small . . .

Off Topic » in reply to Re: Too Small . . .

Re: Too Small . . .

Tom Brosz — 1/18/2002 10:18:15 AM (archived)

I was discussing only the "pit" memorial section being around 70 feet deep. I fully concur that the building or buildings on the site should be AT LEAST as tall as the old buildings.

The whole thread (10 posts)

Sambo's idea to rebuild WTC and memorial - SDG - 1/18/2002 4:41:03 PM
- Re: Sambo's idea to rebuild WTC and memorial - Marcia - 1/19/2002 4:19:02 PM
- idea to rebuild WTC and memorial - Tom Brosz - 1/18/2002 5:12:25 PM
  - Re: 911-foot-deep can be done . . . - D. Spires - 1/18/2002 5:22:12 PM
    - Re: 911-foot-deep can be done . . . - Tom Brosz - 1/18/2002 7:09:08 PM
      - Re: Too Small . . . - D. Spires - 1/18/2002 7:48:12 PM
        
        Re: Too Small . . . - Tom Brosz - 1/18/2002 10:18:15 AM
        
        Re: I know. I was discussing the pit as well . . . (n/t) (n/t) - D. Spires - 1/18/2002 11:05:59 AM
    - At least 3000 ft by my calculation - FrankC - 1/18/2002 6:10:53 PM
    - bedrock 70 feet below grade - SDG - 1/18/2002 9:14:55 AM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (10 posts)