Re: Chemistry is Fun. Food Chemistry is Funnier, so why not use chemicals that get large molecules past barriers where they are not suppose to go. Reading be-Tween 60 the lines. n/t

Off Topic » in reply to Chemistry is Fun. Food Chemistry is Funnier, so why not use chemicals that get large molecules past barriers where they are not suppose to go. Reading be-Tween 60 the lines. n/t

jebadia — 2/13/2003 3:37:07 PM (archived)

chemistry blows nuts and can lick my left testicle

The whole thread (8 posts)

Anyone have enough uptairs to show how you would use the knowledge of cholesterol metabolism as a "slow boat to China",as a very insidious weapon used against mankind? Slow World genocide.n/t - sunblok - 3/5/2002 9:33:01 AM
- Re: Phillip Morris beat them to it (n/t) (n/t) - Mary Anne - 3/5/2002 5:09:43 PM
- Don't sweat it...evolution in action - Tom Brosz - 3/5/2002 3:11:25 PM
- Isn't Ronald McDonald deploying a similar weapon to the world's population - SDG - 3/5/2002 11:57:48 AM
  - Chemistry is Fun. Food Chemistry is Funnier, so why not use chemicals that get large molecules past barriers where they are not suppose to go. Reading be-Tween 60 the lines. n/t - sunblok - 3/5/2002 1:40:33 PM
    - Re: Chemistry is Fun. Food Chemistry is Funnier, so why not use chemicals that get large molecules past barriers where they are not suppose to go. Reading be-Tween 60 the lines. n/t - jebadia - 2/13/2003 3:37:07 PM
    - How about shorter headings and longer messages? (n/t) (n/t) - Tom Brosz - 3/5/2002 3:12:01 PM
    - Dude! - RobVG - 3/5/2002 3:11:35 PM

Recent posts

On this day in Off Topic

The whole thread (8 posts)