You have courage to present a very different viewpoint from norm here. I know exactly what you’re saying.
If the couple were heterosexual would it be different, maybe a little less repulsive to some? Probably not. The thought process would still be considered abnormal.
As far as judgment goes, if I had the power, I wouldn't allow anyone to try to conceive a child that was physically or mentally disadvantaged. Why not adopt a deaf child for crying out loud? Oh, that's right, gays find it difficult to adopt.
Back to judgment. Have you heard of the Mary K. Laterno case? Mary K. was a middle school teacher who had sex with a 12 old boy. They called it rape. She's serving an 8-year prison sentence. I don’t know about you, but when I was twelve there were a couple of teachers I would have doinked if I had the chance. The boy wasn’t harmed except for the fact she got pregnant- twice. She is obviously emotionally and mentally imbalanced and IMO doesn’t belong in prison. Her thought process is abnormal. I doubt she is much of a “threat” to other teenage boys for sadly she appears to have been in love with the boy. It wasn’t just a booty call.
We have to draw the line somewhere Bowser. The question is not only weather it is right or wrong but are we going to allow it? Should we legislate morality? I think so. Whose morality? I would outlaw Bullfighting in Spain if I could. Some in this Country would like to outlaw Boxing. Some abortion. A case can be made for the “wrongness” of these three examples. IMO Bullfighting and Abortion are wrong because they involve the lives of basically helpless beings. Having said that, I support the woman’s right to decide whether abortion is right or wrong.
Do you see a problem here? I could defend Bullfighting saying it’s a time-honored tradition and an integral part of their Culture and Heritage.
We as a society have to decide what’s right and wrong. Without guidelines to live by, morals naturally degrade. These guidelines can be drawn by Religion or by lawmakers.
I think that guidelines should be based on individual freedoms and the protection of the innocent.
A little historical perspective you might enjoy. "The Struggle for American Culture"
Off Topic » in reply to As is all too often usual,
I understand Bowser.
