The point, I believe, is directed at Gore’s displayed ability to slip moral gears at will and, as far as global warming is concerned, “more study was necessary before any draconian government action was taken.”

Yes, we do effect the globe’s weather, but the real argument is that altering anything on a major scale could bring far more disastrous results. What are this scientific findings on this, and what would it cost governments to recover from annual floods at the Missouri Breaks, mud slides along the Yangtze, tornadoes sprouting across Europe, receding coastal waters, stronger hurricanes and typhoons?

It ain’t easy,
Dan