"More cubes rise every day. There is the need for office space. The Twin Towers provided an acre of it on every floor.
But let them rise elsewhere. There is a great emptiness now, 16 acres of breathtaking ground-level flatness at the center of predictable vertical thrust. And that emptiness speaks powerfully, not just of the end of two buildings but of thousands of deaths and a sense of indomitability whose loss is measured in eyes cast up on the city streets whenever a plane flies low."
If this sentiment wins the day then I'm sad to report that we are beaten, depressed, and lacking in human spirit: The terrorists have won.
Maybe we shouldn't build new towers. But one thing is for certain: If we don't build them, it better not be because we are seeking a feeling of emptiness.
Scott
Off Topic » in reply to Re: What should be built at Ground Zero?
With all this desire to feel emptiness I think we are becoming a nation of anorexic neurotics.ctor.
The whole thread (20 posts)
- What should be built at Ground Zero?
- Re: What should be built at Ground Zero?
- Who owns the land? If it's not Federal property we should shut up and let the owners get on with their plans. n/t (n/t)
- Re: What should be built at Ground Zero?
- Re: New Trade Center . . .
- Memorial
- Definitely bigger and better....
- Many Visions for WTC Site . . .
- Many hated the towers for the same reasons many hate the space program
- The towers must be rebuilt!
- A marginally related question.
